@article{G+C 7064, author = {Gustav Roßler}, title = {Ist eine nicht-anthropozentrische Soziologie denkbar? Die Soziologie als anthropologische Humanwissenschaft bei Foucault und Latours Gegenentwurf}, volume = {4}, year = {2018}, url = {https://www.genealogy-critique.net/article/id/7064/}, issue = {1}, doi = {10.16995/lefou.52}, abstract = {<p class="p1">Can we imagine a sociology that is not anthropocentric? This paper deals with sociology as a human science of the 19th century as Foucault describes it in <em>Les mots et les choses</em>. How can the anthropological structure of sociology be defined more specifically? The paper argues that it is characterized by four features: human consciousness as agency of the social, marginalization of things, man as empirico-transcendental doublet, and sociologism. The author discusses Latour's non-anthropocentric sociology as an alternative draft of social theory and specifies the difference between the concepts of modernity used by Latour and Foucault.</p>}, month = {10}, pages = {1–26}, keywords = {actor-network theory,sociology,anthropology,anthropocentric,empirico-transcendental doublet,modernity}, issn = {2515-2076}, publisher={The Open Library of Humanities}, journal = {Le foucaldien} }