@article{G+C 7043, author = {Maurice Erb, Simon Ganahl, Patrick Kilian}, title = {Distant Reading and Discourse Analysis}, volume = {2}, year = {2016}, url = {https://www.genealogy-critique.net/article/id/7043/}, issue = {1}, doi = {10.16995/lefou.16}, abstract = {With the publication of this special issue, <em>Le foucaldien</em> continues its experiment of updating the thought of Michel Foucault. Can historical discourse analyses be carried out with the aid of computers? In order to examine this question, we compare Franco Moretti's Distant Reading with Foucault's archaeological method. Despite their common origins in the French Annales School, the two approaches differ fundamentally. While Moretti interprets literary data by means of social history, Foucault seeks the immanent meaning of discourses. Our preliminary conclusion: digital archaeology appears to founder on the operationalization of the complex concept of the statement (<em>énoncé</em>).}, month = {6}, pages = {1–7}, keywords = {algorithm,archaeology,big data,digital humanities,discourse analysis,distant reading,Foucault,Moretti}, issn = {2515-2076}, publisher={The Open Library of Humanities}, journal = {Le foucaldien} }